 | Dysviz is a 61 year old guy from Okanagan, British Columbia, Canada. photog, ecodesigner, solar renovations,newsjunkie, curious to see where the world is heading to in these history-making times, where the internet can help inform people and press for fundamental changes in environmental policies, human rights, and economic relations between all people and nationson this small world.
"We must never adjust ourselves to economic conditions that take necessities from the many to give luxuries to the few. We must never adjust ourselves to the madness of militarism, and the self-defeating effects of physical violence. ... Creative maladjustment. Thus, it may well be that our world is in dire need of a new organization, The International Association for the Advancement of Creative Maladjustment. " ~~Martin Luther King
In a democracy, who casts the vote for the unborn generation?
on a positive note vist me at
http://flickr.com/photos/vizpix/
http://picasaweb.google.com/vizpix/EcodesignAndCommentary |
- Jul 2, 4:19pm
- Why NOT Nuclear Energy?! Four Reasons...
nuclear power reconsidered
planetthoughts.org [planetthoughts.org]
The hot new thing is... not global warming, but going nukuler... oh, sorry, nuclear.
Well, seriously, some former environmentally-sensitive groups have joined the nuclear bandwagon. I just don't understand it.
1) Most scientists and engineers agree that the supply of uranium if used with current technology (and none of the proclaimed, hoped-for more efficient technologies such as fast breeder reactors are available or have been shown to work) is limited to about 40 years. Read more.
2) There are no safe long-term disposal facilities for nuclear waste. Read more.
3) Nuclear plants are major terrorist targets from air or land attack, and can be made relatively easily to release a highly dangerous cloud of radioactivity.
4) Nuclear energy has never shown itself to be economical, and has existed under a cloud of repeatedly over-optimistic statements regarding cost and safety. Read more
So, we have a limited, dangerous, highly polluting, and expensive resource in nuclear fission as a potential power source. Why then is there so much attention being paid to it now, including by our President George Bush (he of the "nukuler" disposition)?
Could it be that oil and gas will be fading soon on the horizon, coal companies are already firmly in place, and only nuclear energy remains as a new area of expansion where LARGE CORPORATIONS can exert control and extract large sums of money from the public. Solar/wind energy are much more subject to local implementations free of commercial control, or controlled only by local coops or small businesses.
Could that be the reason that General Electric and George Bush seem to love "clean" nuclear energy? Nah, it must be a coincidence. I am sure they would support all the small and medium-sized companies now developing photovoltaic, wind, and water-based renewable sources of energy, if those technologies were as renewable, clean, safe, and economical as nuclear energy!
|